This guide contains everything you need to know about conducting an information security risk assessment questionnaire at your organization.
Isora GRC gives Texas state agencies and higher education institutions one connected workspace to run security assessments aligned to TAC 202 requirements, manage system and vendor inventories, track risks through remediation, and produce the documentation that DIR oversight demands.




























Texas Administrative Code Title 1, Part 10, Chapter 202 requires state agencies and institutions of higher education to implement information security programs aligned to control standards that map to NIST frameworks. The Texas Department of Information Resources (DIR) provides oversight, and biennial compliance reporting requires documented evidence that the institution assessed its security posture, identified gaps, and tracked remediation.
But most Texas agencies and universities still manage TAC 202 compliance in spreadsheets. Security assessments are more like annual checklists, and system inventories are maintained separately, if at all. When TAC 202 is one of several frameworks, the problem grows.
In Texas, universities also manage GLBA for financial aid data, HIPAA for health center records, NIST 800-53 for federal research programs, and FERPA for student records. Each framework has its own spreadsheet, its own assessment process, and its own reporting timeline. The security team runs four parallel compliance programs in four disconnected systems, and DIR only sees the TAC 202 slice.
Launch security assessments using questionnaires aligned to TAC 202's information security requirements, including access controls, risk management, incident response, change management, and the control categories that map to NIST frameworks. Target departments, divisions, and campus units. Collect evidence inline so every assessment response carries the documentation that DIR compliance reporting requires. Set up recurring assessment cycles aligned to biennial reporting timelines.
Track every system, application, and vendor that falls within TAC 202 scope. In Isora, each inventory record links to its assessments, associated risks, data classifications, and contract documentation. When DIR asks what systems handle sensitive data and which controls are in place, the answer is a filtered report drawn from current records rather than a search across three departments and five shared drives.
When a TAC 202 assessment identifies a control gap, Isora publishes it directly to the risk register with full lineage — the control standard it maps to, the assessment question that surfaced it, and the department or system it applies to. Then, assign owners, set remediation deadlines, and track progress. That way, the security team can see the institution's risk posture in one view that’s current at any given point in the reporting cycle.
Generate reports for assessment completion rates, control effectiveness, risk status, and remediation progress by department, control category, or institution-wide. In Isora, every metric drills down to the underlying assessment response and evidence. Demonstrate continuous compliance between reporting cycles with an append-only audit log that creates a time-stamped record. Then, export documentation packages for DIR biennial reporting, internal audit, and institutional leadership, in just a few clicks.
Third-Party Risk Management Frameworks: How to Build and Govern a TPRM Program A third-party risk management (TPRM) framework is the structure an...
TPRM Maturity Model: How to Score Third-Party Risk A TPRM maturity model is a self-assessment framework to score how developed a third-party risk...
NIST CSF vs Other Frameworks: Comparison Guide and Mapping Resources The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) is a voluntary, risk-based cybersecurity...
NIST 800-53 Vendor Management: How to Manage Third-Party Risk NIST 800-53 vendor management uses the NIST 800-53 System and Services Acquisition (SA)...
NIST 800-53 Data Classification: How It Determines Your Controls Before selecting the right NIST 800-53 controls, organizations must classify their...
NIST 800-53 Controls: Complete List and How They Work NIST 800-53 contains 1,196 security and privacy controls organized across 20 control families,...
Texas Administrative Code Title 1, Part 10, Chapter 202 establishes information security standards for Texas state agencies and institutions of higher education. It requires organizations to implement security programs with documented policies, risk assessments, incident response procedures, and control implementations aligned to standards that map to NIST frameworks. The Department of Information Resources (DIR) provides oversight and requires biennial compliance reporting.
TAC 202’s security control standards align to NIST frameworks, particularly NIST 800-53 and NIST CSF. Isora supports TAC 202 alongside NIST in the same workspace, with shared inventories, a shared risk register, and shared reporting. Organizations managing TAC 202 and NIST compliance assess once against mapped controls rather than running separate assessment programs.
Yes. Texas universities and agencies frequently manage TAC 202 alongside GLBA (financial aid data), HIPAA (health center records), NIST 800-53 (federal research), FERPA, and HECVAT (vendor assessments). Isora supports all of these in one workspace. Assessment results, inventories, and risks are shared across frameworks, so a single data model serves every program.
Isora generates compliance reports from live assessment data. Reports show assessment completion, control effectiveness, risk posture, and remediation progress. Because the data is structured and time-stamped, biennial reporting becomes an export rather than a weeks-long project. The audit log gives DIR verifiable evidence of continuous compliance activity between reporting periods.