Every security team needs a strong, scalable way to manage IT risk—not just pass audits.
Platforms like Hyperproof and Vanta focus on compliance automation, helping organizations meet frameworks like SOC 2 and ISO 27001 faster.
These tools automate audit prep, but don’t support the deeper workflows required for ongoing IT risk management across assets, vendors, and departments.
Isora GRC offers a more user-friendly solution. It’s purpose-built for security teams who need to run assessments, manage inventories, and track risks, without being limited to audit cycles.
Let’s give this a detailed review.
Choosing the Right Platform for IT Risk Management
Vanta and Hyperproof work well for compliance, but their risk capabilities often feel like a layer on top. They weren’t built for assessments at scale, real-time risk tracking, or collaboration across business units.
Isora GRC is different. It gives security teams the structure to run assessments, collect input from across the org, document risk, and manage exceptions—all in one place, with workflows designed for adoption.
The Workflow That Matters: Managing IT Risks and Compliance
Risk management is about more than uploading evidence. It’s about engaging your organization, gathering insights from teams and vendors, and turning that into action.
With Isora GRC, you can manage internal and third-party assessments, maintain inventories, track exceptions, and document risk in real time. It’s a purpose-built workflow that supports security—not just compliance.
How Each Platform Supports IT Risk Management Workflows
| Workflow Area | Hyperproof | Vanta | Isora GRC |
| Assessment Management | Hyperproof includes compliance and risk tools. Still, some say it lacks depth. Custom assessments may be hard to build. | Vanta automates SOC 2, ISO 27001, and more. Still, some say it’s too focused on standard setups. Companies with special needs might feel boxed in. | Centralized, intuitive assessment dashboard across business units, vendors, and assets. Built specifically for security teams. |
| Questionnaire Delivery & Completion | Hyperproof supports questionnaires. However, advanced needs may push teams to look elsewhere. | Vanta supports compliance questionnaires. Advanced options feel limited, especially for large or custom forms. | Customizable and prebuilt questionnaires for frameworks like NIST, ISO, GLBA, HIPAA, and more. Designed for internal and external collaboration. |
| Inventory Tracking | Some inventory tools exist, but they feel basic. Teams with large inventories might need extra support. | Vanta handles compliance better than asset tracking. Teams needing full inventory tools might feel shortchanged. | Centralized tracking of assets, vendors, and organizational units with integration support for existing data sources. |
| Risk Register & Exception Management | The risk register works, but workflows feel simple. Handling exceptions may take extra manual steps. | Risk tools exist but feel basic. Exception handling lacks depth. Big teams with complex systems may face roadblocks. | Flexible, collaborative risk register with scoring, status, evidence, and ownership tied directly to assessments. Exception management is built-in and intuitive—no extra modules or configuration required. |
| Scoring, Reporting & Risk Visualization | Reporting tools exist but lack detail. Risk visuals need improvement for clearer risk views. | Dashboards give a quick view, but detailed reports fall short. Risk visuals feel simple, which may limit deep reviews. | Automated scorecards, risk maps, and executive-friendly reports with actionable insights—no manual config required. |
| Collaboration & User Experience | Most users say the experience feels smooth. But flexible team collaboration may still be missing. | Vanta looks easy to use. Still, some say team collaboration feels thin. Cross-team compliance work may slow down. | WCAG-compliant, award-nominated interface with built-in commenting, team workflows, and fast onboarding. |
| Implementation & Setup | Setup can go quickly, but special needs may slow things down. Some users say extra setup work is required. | Vanta works well out of the box. But teams with unique setups may face delays. Custom workflows often need more time. | No-code setup in days or weeks. Minimal IT lift required. Designed to go live quickly across teams and vendors. |
What Sets Isora GRC Apart?
Isora GRC was purpose-built for information security teams—designed to support the real workflows behind risk and compliance, not just generate reports. While legacy GRC platforms require months of configuration and rigid processes, Isora takes a modern, scalable approach:
- Purpose-built for security and third-party risk teams
- No extra modules or cross-department bloat—just the workflows that matter.
- Easy for anyone to use
- Clean UI, no complex training, and built to drive adoption across the org.
- Streamlined for action, not just documentation
- Assessments, questionnaires, inventories, risk tracking, and reporting—all in one place.
- Fast, no-code implementation
- Go live in weeks, not quarters, with minimal IT lift.
- Scales with your program
- Whether you’re running a lean risk function or supporting a large institution, Isora grows with you—without getting in the way.
Who Each Platform Is Best For
| Platform | Who It’s For |
| Hyperproof | Companies wanting a simple way to collect evidence for audits. Not designed for deep-risk work. |
| Vanta | Fast-moving teams trying to check off audit boxes. Good for early compliance, not much else. |
| Isora GRC | Security teams that need a scalable, usable IT risk management program across their organization. |
What Our Customers Say About Isora GRC
Security teams at top institutions are using Isora GRC to replace legacy tools and manual processes with intuitive workflows and actionable insight.
FAQs
What’s the difference between Hyperproof, Vanta, and Isora GRC?
Hyperproof and Vanta are audit-first platforms that focus on automating evidence collection for frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA. Isora GRC is built for ongoing IT and vendor risk management—supporting assessments, risk tracking, exception workflows, and inventory management beyond audits.
Are Hyperproof and Vanta considered GRC platforms?
They cover some compliance-related workflows but aren’t full GRC platforms. Their primary use case is audit readiness, not continuous risk management. Isora GRC supports broader governance capabilities designed for security teams.
Does Isora GRC replace platforms like Hyperproof or Vanta?
Yes, particularly for organizations that want to go beyond audit automation. Isora GRC helps teams manage risk as an ongoing process by centralizing assessments, inventories, risks, and exceptions across internal and external stakeholders.
Which platform is better for managing IT and vendor risk across the organization?
Isora GRC is purpose-built for that. It supports collaborative risk assessments, risk registers, third-party reviews, and exception tracking—making it easier to operationalize risk management across departments.
Can Isora GRC be used alongside Hyperproof or Vanta?
Yes. Some organizations use Isora GRC for risk operations and keep audit tools like Vanta or Hyperproof for certification prep. Others consolidate onto Isora when audit needs are part of a larger risk program.
What should I look for in a platform that supports IT risk management workflows?
Look for flexible assessment tools, collaborative exception tracking, real-time risk visibility, and inventory management. Isora GRC offers these as core capabilities—making it a better fit for ongoing risk work, not just point-in-time audits.
Other Relevant Content 