Security teams need more than configurable dashboards and audit checklists—they need workflows that actually support how risk gets managed across the organization.
Onspring and AuditBoard are both part of the all-in-one GRC category, built to serve compliance, audit, and governance teams across large enterprises. While they offer broad functionality, they often require significant customization, long ramp-up times, and don’t always align with how security teams operate day to day.
When tools are built to serve everyone, they often serve no one particularly well. That’s especially true for teams focused on IT and third-party risk.
Isora GRC takes a more focused approach. It’s purpose-built for security teams that need to run assessments, track risk, manage inventories, and drive adoption across the organization—without the overhead of traditional GRC suites.
Choosing the Right Platform for IT Risk Management
Onspring offers extreme flexibility, but often requires heavy configuration to be usable. AuditBoard delivers strong audit workflows but isn’t designed for continuous risk management. Both tools can be powerful—but neither offers the structure, simplicity, and speed security teams need to operationalize IT risk.
Isora GRC is different. It delivers structured, repeatable workflows for internal and third-party assessments, asset and vendor inventories, exception management, and risk tracking—all in a platform that’s fast to deploy, easy to use, and built for real-world adoption.
The Workflow That Matters: Managing IT Risks and Compliance
Managing IT risk means engaging people across departments and vendors, collecting assessments, tracking exceptions, managing inventories, and maintaining a living risk register. It’s not a one-time exercise—it’s a continuous workflow that requires clarity and coordination.
Many GRC platforms weren’t designed to support this kind of hands-on risk management. Their audit-first design or configurable complexity often gets in the way of progress, leaving security teams to stitch together solutions manually.
Isora GRC unifies these workflows into one platform—making it easier to manage risk across the organization, collaborate in real time, and respond to issues as they emerge.
How Each Platform Supports IT Risk Management Workflows
| Workflow Area | Onspring | AuditBoard | Isora GRC |
| Assessment Management | Onspring gives strong flexibility for assessments. Building forms and workflows is easy with drag-and-drop tools. But users say too much freedom can lead to messy setups without careful planning. | AuditBoard handles assessments well, but admin tasks take time. Adding fields or editing steps can feel slow and tricky. Online edits sometimes cause data loss. | Centralized, intuitive assessment dashboard across business units, vendors, and assets. Built specifically for security teams. |
| Questionnaire Delivery & Completion | The platform handles surveys well with automation options. Still, some users find the interface a little dated, and large questionnaires can slow down system performance. | Survey tools link into the platform, which helps. Still, managing files in projects feels clunky. The tool stores documents but doesn’t fully support team collaboration. | Customizable and prebuilt questionnaires for frameworks like NIST, ISO, GLBA, HIPAA, and more. Designed for internal and external collaboration. |
| Inventory Tracking | Inventory management is customizable, but it takes effort. Users report that setting up asset libraries and linking them to workflows needs detailed configuration knowledge. | The system connects to many apps, which is helpful. But tools like tick-and-tie need work. Some users want better training and clearer help guides. | Centralized tracking of assets, vendors, and organizational units with integration support for existing data sources. |
| Risk Register & Exception Management | Onspring links risk, controls, and audits cleanly. However, users mention that exception tracking feels basic out of the box and needs heavy customization to match real-world needs. | AuditBoard links risk, compliance, and audit. But long-time users report weak support. Risk and exception tools need stronger customization. | Flexible, collaborative risk register with scoring, status, evidence, and ownership tied directly to assessments. Exception management is built-in and intuitive—no extra modules or configuration required. |
| Scoring, Reporting & Risk Visualization | Reports and dashboards are highly configurable. Still, first-time users feel overwhelmed by too many options and want better templates for faster insights. | Reports and risk visuals work, but new features roll out slowly. Some key tools, like risk scoring in OpsAudit, feel half-done. | Automated scorecards, risk maps, and executive-friendly reports with actionable insights—no manual config required. |
| Collaboration & User Experience | Navigation feels intuitive once configured. Users like the flexibility but say collaboration features, like shared editing and real-time updates, could be stronger compared to newer platforms. | The layout feels clean and simple. Teams can share files in the cloud. Still, workstreams don’t support true team editing. The tool feels more like storage than a workspace. | WCAG-compliant, award-nominated interface with built-in commenting, team workflows, and fast onboarding. |
| Implementation & Setup | Setup takes longer than expected if building from scratch. Strong documentation helps, but many users recommend guided support services to speed up initial deployment. | Setup goes fast, and support feels strong. Still, users want deeper training to unlock the tool’s full power. | No-code setup in days or weeks. Minimal IT lift required. Designed to go live quickly across teams and vendors. |
What Sets Isora GRC Apart?
Isora GRC was purpose-built for information security teams—designed to support the real workflows behind risk and compliance, not just generate reports. While legacy GRC platforms require months of configuration and rigid processes, Isora takes a modern, scalable approach:
- Purpose-built for security and third-party risk teams
- No extra modules or cross-department bloat—just the workflows that matter.
- Easy for anyone to use
- Clean UI, no complex training, and built to drive adoption across the org.
- Streamlined for action, not just documentation
- Assessments, questionnaires, inventories, risk tracking, and reporting—all in one place.
- Fast, no-code implementation
- Go live in weeks, not quarters, with minimal IT lift.
- Scales with your program
- Whether you’re running a lean risk function or supporting a large institution, Isora grows with you—without getting in the way.
Who Each Platform Is Best For
| Platform | Who It’s For |
| Onspring | Teams needing a customizable, no-code platform to manage audits, risks, and compliance. Works well for process-heavy departments like audit and legal. Can be overkill for security teams that just want to run a clean, focused InfoSec program. |
| AuditBoard | Mid to large teams doing audits and tracking controls. Simple for auditors but not built with InfoSec teams in mind. |
| Isora GRC | Security teams that need a scalable, usable IT risk management program across their organization. |
What Our Customers Say About Isora GRC
Security teams at top institutions are using Isora GRC to replace legacy tools and manual processes with intuitive workflows and actionable insight.
FAQ
What’s the difference between Onspring, AuditBoard, and Isora GRC?
Onspring and AuditBoard are configurable GRC platforms built to support a wide range of governance functions like audit, compliance, and enterprise risk. Isora GRC is purpose-built for information security teams, offering a more focused and usable platform for assessments, inventories, and risk tracking.
Are Onspring and AuditBoard considered all-in-one GRC platforms?
Yes. They serve multiple teams across compliance, audit, and legal. This flexibility can come at the cost of simplicity and usability for security teams who need to move fast with clear workflows.
Does Isora GRC replace tools like Onspring or AuditBoard?
For IT and vendor risk management, yes. Isora GRC offers a simpler and faster solution designed specifically for security workflows—without requiring extensive configuration or cross-department coordination.
Which platform is better for managing IT and third-party risk?
Isora GRC focuses directly on those workflows: issuing assessments, tracking risks and exceptions, and maintaining inventories. Onspring and AuditBoard may support these use cases but are often oriented toward audit and governance teams.
Can Isora GRC be used alongside Onspring or AuditBoard?
Yes. Some organizations use Isora to handle IT risk while retaining their broader GRC platform for compliance or audit. Others adopt Isora GRC exclusively when operational risk management is the core priority.
What should I look for in a GRC platform for IT risk management?
Look for a solution that supports end-to-end workflows—like assessments, inventories, and risk registers—and is easy to deploy and use. Isora GRC is designed to help security teams do the work, not just document it.
Other Relevant Content 